A laboratory study from Hacettepe University in Ankara investigated how whitening and non-whitening toothpastes affect the colour stability and surface roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials under simulated oral conditions. Researchers used thermocycling in a coffee solution followed by simulated toothbrushing to replicate long-term clinical exposure and mechanical wear.

Toothpaste type has minimal impact

The findings show that whitening toothpastes do not significantly influence colour stability or surface roughness compared to conventional formulations. This suggests that whitening products may not cause greater surface degradation than standard toothpastes. However, the response to staining and ageing varied markedly depending on the material tested.

Glass-ceramics outperform resin composites

The study evaluated two glass-ceramics, IPS e.max CAD and CEREC Tessera, and two resin-containing materials, SHOFU Block HC and VITA ENAMIC. Glass-ceramic materials demonstrated superior colour stability after coffee exposure and brushing, while SHOFU Block HC showed the greatest colour changes. Surface roughness increased more significantly in the resin-containing materials, particularly VITA ENAMIC, which exhibited micro-pits and irregular wear patterns. The glass-ceramics largely maintained their surface integrity. Although these differences were unlikely to be clinically relevant for plaque accumulation, the authors noted that resin-containing materials may require more frequent maintenance or repolishing to preserve appearance over time.

The study was published online on 23 March 2026 in Clinical Oral Investigations.